Time is Money, Money is not Time

I think its interesting how things hardly ever go both ways; a square is a rectangle but a rectangle is not a square, for example. It seems to be some sort of double standard. 

In the same circle, Time and Money go hand-in-hand but not side by side. Those with time make money (or have a better chance to make money) which is why single mothers, with mouths to feed and children to put to bed do not have as much Time to make money as she would if she did not have children, and therefore she has less Money. 

So if she had more time, hypothetically, she could have more money. Does that suggest then, that if she simply had more money, would she have more time? Not literally, for sure: we all have to abide by the 24/7 rule. Rich people don't get 25 hour days. But, like Stevie said before me, she wouldn't have to wait as much, because she could afford things like over night delivery or a car instead of the L. So here it seems to become clear(ish) that Time is more valuable than Money. 

Unfortunately, those with less money end up spending more time than those with out, so their valuable time is taken from them because they don't have money to obtain it fully. Waiting for goods to go on sale means that time is left in a space between those who can afford the non-sale items and those who must wait for the same things to go on sale. It is not the rich people's time that fills that gap either. So it seems, that because of the value of money, time is lost, and money not gained by those who have less money to start with. 

I've talked myself into a circle and I'm not sure this is any clearer... but its time for me to go to work... to make money...